The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: What It Means for Pass-Through Entities

Published by BradyRenner CPAs | January 8, 2018

Editor’s Note: This is the second in a three-article series on the new federal tax law. The other articles are as follows:

On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” into law, marking one of the most dramatic transformations in the history of the modern tax code. Designed to spur investment and economic growth, the law is at the same time simple in concept and yet extremely complex in execution.

With that in mind, it is imperative for small business owners to become familiar with the law and its provisions as they impact both business and individual tax strategies. In this three-part series, we’ll examine some of the key policy highlights that business owners should be aware of as they plan for the future.

Corporations and Pass-Through Entities

In today’s business environment, there are two very distinct business entity models. Businesses that pay corporate taxes on their own earnings are commonly organized as “C” corporations, whereas businesses that pass their earnings through to their owners, shareholders or members (i.e. “pass-through entities”) are commonly organized as “S” corporations, as partnerships, or they may be registered at the state level as LLCs. It is worth noting that sole proprietorships are also treated as pass-through entities by the IRS.

Understanding this distinction allows us to evaluate the law’s impact on businesses, because the changes to the tax code are not the same for these two kinds of entity formats — a point which is particularly true for pass-through entities and their owners.

One reason why the distinction has become so critical is that, historically, entrepreneurs have been attracted to “S corporations and partnerships precisely because they eliminated the “double taxation” problem which can vex the shareholders in a “C” corporation. However, the primary driving force behind the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was an (initially single-minded) overwhelming commitment by the Republican congress to reduce the corporate tax rate that impacts “C” corporations.

Introducing Section 199A

To address this issue and ensure that pass-through entities also maintain meaningful benefits from the new law, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act created Section 199A, which is a new provision in the IRS code. Simply put, Section 199A will enable the owners of sole proprietorships, “S” corporations and partnerships to take a deduction of 20% against their business income. This provision effectively reduces the top rate on these business income types from 40.8% under prior law to 29.6% under the new law, based upon the deduction of 20% multiplied by the new top rate of 37%.

However, Section 199A is not simple, and it contains many points of concern and confusion for small business owners. Section 199A makes clear that the deduction is available to all taxpayers other than a corporation. This becomes complex if you are addressing multiple entities (where one entity has an interest in another entity), if rental property is involved, or in the case of certain trusts and estates.

Where the provision becomes tricky is in the definition of the deduction itself. Under the law, the deduction is defined as follows:

The deduction is equal to the SUM OF:

– the “combined qualified business income” of the taxpayer, or
– 20% of the excess of taxable income over the sum of any net capital gain

– 20% of qualified cooperative dividends, or
– taxable income less net capital gain.

Understanding Qualified Business Income (QBI)

Qualified Business Income is defined in Section 199A as the “ordinary” income – less ordinary deductions – that one earns from a sole-proprietorship, S corporation, or partnership. QBI does not include any wages one earns as an employee. This means that a business could have two people doing the exact same job – one as an independent contractor and one as an employee – with the self-employment income of the former being considered QBI (and thus eligible for a 20% deduction), while the wages earned by the latter would not be eligible for the 20% deduction. QBI also does not include investment income such as short-term capital gains or losses, long-term capital gains or losses, dividend income, or interest income.

If an individual is a shareholder or a partner in a flow-through entity, it is essential to note that QBI also does not include any wages or guaranteed payments received from the entity. In other words, an owner of an “S” corporation who receives both wages and distributions would only be able to count the value of the distributions toward the QBI, and not the value of the wages. Of course, it is essential not to try and ‘game’ this distinction by avoiding wage payments to oneself as the owner of an active pass-through business, as the IRS requires that “reasonable compensation” be paid and reported as wages by the owner(s) where applicable.

One major area of concern and confusion is that the law specifies that the QBI must be earned in a “qualified trade or business”, and the intention behind this phrasing is not clear. One conservative interpretation suggests that this means a trade or business must be “regular, continuous and substantial” (this is referenced in Section 162 of the IRS code). This could have a major impact on whether income from rental property and other real estate-related income is included or excluded from the QBI.

There is an additional policy distinction that is critical to note. The 20% of QBI deduction is not applicable to those engaged in a “specified service trade or business”, which includes “any trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees,” although architects and engineers are exempted from this restriction under a different rule in the section.

In addition to the potential limitations associated with what constitutes income which can be applied to the QBI, there are also a number of limitations of note. Eligible taxpayers are only allowed to deduct 20% of their QBI up to the following limits, as defined in the law:

The limit is the GREATER OF:

– 50% of the taxpayer’s allocable share of the “W-2 wages” paid by the business, or

– 25% of the taxpayer’s allocable share of the “W-2 pages” paid by the business PLUS 2.5% of the taxpayer’s allocable share of the “unadjusted basis” immediately after acquisition of all “qualified property.”

These limitations are intended to prevent a wholesale defection of high-income professionals from paid employment into the creation of their own pass-through entities as a form of tax avoidance. Determining the “allocable share” can be challenging. For a shareholder in an “S” corporation, the IRS code provides specific instructions. Section 1366 and Section 1377 require that all items of an “S” corporation be allocated pro-rata, on a per-share/per-day basis. However, for partnerships, the determination can become complicated by special allocation allowances and other variations associated with the allocation process.

However, these limitations can severely limit the benefits that accrue to a small business owner. For example, the owner of a small LLC who earns $150,000 in total income from the business in a year, where $10,000 is paid as wages and there is no property-related income, would reach the limit.

However, the law also provides that the two W-2-based limitations can be ignored by a taxpayer completely if the taxpayer’s total Taxable Income (not QBI or adjusted gross income) is less than the “threshold amount” for that tax year. The “threshold amounts” for 2018 are $315,000 if the taxpayer is married, and $157,500 for all other taxpayers. In addition, to address the challenge of achieving a sudden crossover point, taxpayers will be allowed to “phase in” the W-2 limitations over the next $100,000 of taxable income above the threshold point (if the taxpayer is married filing jointly, or $50,000 for everyone else).

Significantly, even individuals engaged in a “specified service trade or business” can claim the 20% of QBI deduction, provided that the taxpayer’s taxable income is less than $315,000 (if the taxpayer is married filing jointly, and $157,500 for all other taxpayers), and a different phase-in process is applied until the taxpayer’s taxable income reaches $415,000.

The Impact on Professional Service Firms 

One important question will be whether professionals in the “specified service trade or business” fields will consider migrating from “S” corporations to LLCs without “S” election or to partnerships, since reasonable compensation is not included when calculating QBI. This is due to the fact that “S” corporations are required to pay wages to any shareholder who is also an officer and provides “significant services” to the corporation, under the “reasonable compensation” standard, specifically to ensure that “S” corporation shareholders avoid using distributions as a means of avoiding payroll taxes. In contrast, partnerships cannot pay wages to their partners (only guaranteed payments), and there is no “reasonable compensation” standard for partnerships, because partnership income is usually subject to self-employment tax.

The highlights shared in this article are just a summary of key points in the law, and the impact of Section 199A will be complex and wide-ranging. In the third article of this series, we will address specific provisions of the law that impact individual taxpayers.

Remember that the actual law itself is 1,097 pages in length, and contains numerous provisions and adjustments that could impact your small business, and you as a small business owner. Make sure to meet with your CPA or tax preparer proactively to review the impact of the new tax code in detail, and prepare to adjust and update your tax strategy accordingly.

Image Credit: 401k Calculator (Flickr @ Creative Commons)